Percentage of ethnic group to be removed by Nazi Germany from future settlement areas

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generalplan_Ost

Look up the numbers in the article. It’s not the same, at all.

Also other comments like

It’s like saying: “do you prefer being stabbed in the left lung or the right lung?” both are just bad

8 upvotes and no downvotes or any correcting comments by now.

I am puzzled.

Adding up to 10, like the other comment explains, is the common way. Using 14 as intermediate step suggests a different way of thinking. OP could be on to something if that’s normal to you.

7 + 6 = 10 + 3 = 13

and seeing everyone make the same stupid mistakes over and over

Propaganda has improved. People don’t have communities. It’s worse. People have to be more clever than before to compensate.

Thank you.

After Tiananmen they can’t believe in #1. The party showed that they were in control.

#2 is possible but requires that the elite mistakes money for power. I cannot imagine that old money makes such a rooky mistake.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_steel_production

China is producing so much steel that the USA cannot believe that they can contain the Chinese navy in a prolonged war.

I cannot pin it down but things don’t fully add up.

Downvoters, for #1? Jelzin was corrupt. Was there something similar in China?

Außer diese dann komplett auszublenden ist mir noch kein sinnvollerer Kompromiss eingefallen.

Also mal mit anderen zusammen überlegen. Vielleicht auch nicht auf Kompromiss fokussieren, das geht ja schon stark von einer Nullsummensituation aus.

Was sind denn die drei wichtigsten Themen?

South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

How do nukes help South Africa? They don’t have rockets. What do they threaten to bomb that is a deterrent?

Where are those informations diskussed? If the information was out in March then Lemmy as a whole is not good at filtering the relevant news.

Now, how do I focus without the stress of option 2? Without focus there is no option 1.

About one hour in, he is talking about a three front war against China, Russia and Iran that was predicted in the 1990ies.

Why has the USA allowed China to become powerful? That war could have been fought earlier with a much bigger technological lead.

Political change is driven by 3% of the population. 1/3 voted for democrats. So 1% of the population would be incarcerated. Peak prison population was 0.7%. Doubling that capacity is possible, especially if prison camps can be used.

What’s the winning strategy? If violence is escalated until everybody is incarcerated not much will change.

It’s still possible to ask if Germany could have prevented it.

Nebenbeibemerkt ist es gesellschaftlich normal, mit Lügen zu leben. Wir nennen das Mythos. Bei Nordkorea fällt uns das auf. Bei Fankreich glauben wir an Freiheit, Gleichheit und Brüderlichkeit, ignorieren aber Haiti.

Für den Bürger ist es nicht klar, welche Unwahrheiten er weiter glauben soll und welche nicht. Da Abweichler nicht freundlich behandelt werden, ist es meist besser, das zu tun, was alle machen. Und selbst die Abweichler haben wiederum Dogmen, die nicht hinterfragt werden können. Das macht es schwer, eine Alternative zu entwickeln.

Die Wahrheit ist bekannt, wird aber nicht in das eigene Handeln integriert, weil das zu anstrengend, zu kostspielig oder zu beängstigend wäre.

Weitermachen wie bisher ist doch dann die wirtschaftlich richtige Entscheidung. Wir leben im Kapitalismus. Damit ist es nicht Hypernormalisierung, weil der Kapitalismus auch in der Krise funktioniert. Er sah nur wegen des Systemwettbewerbs mit der UDSSR früher besser aus.

unter anderem deswegen, weil sie sich keine Vorstellung von einer Alternative machen konnten

Welche Akternative haben wir denn jetzt? Die Elite glaubt weiter dran. Finnland bekommt auch Steuerersparnis für Reiche. https://feddit.org/post/14157148

Die Wahrheit kann eigentlich bei allen Themen nicht diskutiert werden, weil es zu viele ideologische Verflechtungen gibt.

Klimakrise, Demokratiekrise, Krieg, Flucht, Gewalt

Wo können die Themen trotzdem konstruktiv diskutiert werden? Es werden doch sicher alle Fakten bekannt sein. D.h. wenn sich die Gesellschaft in einem Format zusammenfindet und alles zusammenträgt, sollte sich eine Lösung ergeben.

hadn’t been held back by lazy MS et al.

MS is not lazy but working hard to maintain their lead.

edit: Just noticed that my phrasing is bad and could be seen as praise. OP is right, MS is holding everybody back.

I meant to say that they abuse their market domination to maintain their lead.

Look at MS Teams. It was free until Slack was done as a competitor.

MS did things but that’s inevitable. The crucial part are the things that they prevented.

It’s increadible that OP is even downvoted.

Easiest trick: Show two options, let people pick a side and then pitch them against each other.

The problem is complex enough that both options are hammers that won’t help to repair a watch.

It’s two quotes. Miners don’t throw coal into furnaces.

My liberal friends were saying, ‘You can’t expect them to be able to do that,’” Biden told his New Hampshire audience. “Anybody who can go down 300 to 3,000 feet in a mine, sure in hell can learn to program as well, but we don’t think of it that way,” he said.

“Gimme a break! Anybody who can throw coal into a furnace can learn how to program for God’s sake.”