Two UN peacekeepers in Lebanon have been wounded by Israeli fire, the mission said on Thursday, as Israel’s military ground operations in the country continued.

In a statement, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) said two of its members were wounded after a Merkava tank fired towards an observation tower at Unifil headquarters in Naqoura, “directly hitting it and causing them to fall”.

“[Israeli] soldiers also fired on UN position (UNP) 1-31 in Labbouneh, hitting the entrance to the bunker where peacekeepers were sheltering, and damaging vehicles and a communications system,” said the peacekeeping mission.

“An IDF drone was observed flying inside the UN position up to the bunker entrance.”

Israeli attacks in Lebanon over the past month, including a bombing campaign and ground invasion, have killed over 1,200 people and displaced one million.

  • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    the countires those soldiers are from should bring in some jets and take care of that problem. Putitng up with being shot by far right wing fascists is some shameful bullshit.

    • pickman_model@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Maybe they’re using the tried-and-tested strategy of targeting UN forces to make them leave. It happened in Rwanda too, they killed those Belgian peacekeepers and then Belgium and France pulled out. Shortly after that, the Rwandan start their genocide. At least the Israelis seem to have just wounded the peacekeepers, unlike the Rwandan, who hacked the Belgian with machetes. Nevertheless, it doesn’t look very promising.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can you name a settler colonial project that committed a genocide that wouldn’t fire at peacekeepers?

          • acargitz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Because as usual religion can be used to argue for as well as against a political question. The only self coherent framework that has as its logical conclusion Israeli policy is nationalism.

            Edit: plus, a nationalist explanatory framework is least susceptible to the moral hazard of anti-Semitism. Israeli policy is not exceptional, it’s as banal as Serbian or Azerbaijani ethnic nationalism, revanchism, jingoism and bigotry.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Zionism is a Settler Colonialist Project. Israel has never represented all Jewish people and never will, nor are it’s actions done to benefit all Jewish people. The conflation is itself antisemitic. Adi Callai, an Israeli, does a great analysis of how Antisemitism has been weaponized (see 29:01) by Zionism during its history.

            Ilan Pappe, an Israeli historian, discusses it more in his book

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 minutes ago

                Dude, stop. Conflating the two is responsible for genuine Antisemitism. Antisemites love the conflation because they can then attribute all the war crimes and political influence of Israel to all Jewish people, in order to justify their own antisemitic conspiracy theories. It is genuinely responsible for a rise in hate crimes abroad. Zionism is a form of Fascism that weaponizes antisemitism as a shield for it’s actions.

      • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fucking no. Israel does not represent judiasm. Jews everywhere disavow them. Zionism is not Jewish.

        Claiming that this is Jewish is antisemitism from both Israel and you.

        This is about land, not religion.

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure the US will protest this time with real energy and will then send another billion in military equipment.

    • sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I’m sure the US will protest this time with real energy

      Are you thinking ‘sternly worded memo’ or ‘a leak that Biden is outraged behind the scenes’, but not officially? Those seem extreme.

      How about one or all 3 of these:

      1. We order 100 pizzas to the Netenyahu family house that they didnt even order themselves, and leak a photo of Biden on the phone to the media. We’ll pay for those pizzas of course.
      2. We could also send a prepaid hot stone masseuse to their home who also had a mildly questionable political bumper sticker on their car.
      3. We could send the far right Israel government leaders on a luxury vacation, but ensure that the little bottles of alchohol in first class on the plane are extra small sized. I’ve never been in first class myself, but I can imagine that would be extremely frustrating.
  • Don Escobar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m sure the UN peacekeepers were hanging around hospitals, schools and/or Palestinians

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why are they even there?

    From a real news source: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/un-peacekeepers-lebanon-say-we-are-staying-despite-israeli-attacks-2024-10-10/

    UNIFIL is mandated by the Security Council to help the Lebanese army keep the country’s south free of weapons and armed personnel other than those of the state. That has sparked friction with Hezbollah, which effectively controls the area.

    1. They’re supposed to be Peacekeepers not Peace Makers. There’s a war happening and usually Peacekeepers leave the area when it becomes an active war.

    2. Their mission was to find Hezbollah weapons… well it seems they weren’t all that effective at doing that mission. Anyway, the IDF will remove those weapons for them. So they no longer have a mission to be there to do.

    This is extremely incompetent on the part of the UN. It’s a struggle for the UN to get countries to volunteer soldiers to be UN Peacekeepers. The UN using Peacekeepers as human shields isn’t going to help in that. Peacekeepers serve an important function, and the UN putting them in unnecessary danger because it’s upset at Israel is completely irresponsible.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Downvote the bot? They do in every thread, form of protest against it from what I’ve read. They don’t like 1 person with a bias generating a bases for everyone as to whether a source is legitimate, as it could skew unfamiliar people to believe what isn’t true. Also, it’s frame of left/right is bias towards a localized perception from their area, not a global perception.