• Kronusdark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    212
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    7 days ago

    I think given the current political situation this is the right call. No one knows what the Russian government might compel otherwise innocent devs to do.

    That said, we (and I mean society, not any particular individual) should be mindful that we don’t slip into bigotry.

  • MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Linus is from Finland. Finns barely tolerate Russians under usual circumstances. These are not usual circumstances.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      True he could have banned them long ago, it’s his project in the end, but he didn’t, he only did it after the sanctions

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      6 days ago

      Linus’s dad was a Finnish communist and lived in USSR for some time, one can say a VIP person. You actually lack the context to realize how important this is. Many people of such connections (not accusing Linus, no) are usually still connected to Russia’s regime more than, ahem, me. The documents about just whom that encompasses are still secret in Russian archives. Well, technically one can get a permission, but random people are refused it.

      Finns barely tolerate Russians under usual circumstances.

      Yes, we know that, massacring Russian civilian population during 1917-1918 and then doing that David-n-Goliath thing in the Winter War, which is the only thing they want to remember, and then 1941-1945 with Finnish troops participating in the blockade of Lengingrad and making concentration camps for civilian population, again.

      I don’t get how that should work in Linus’s favor, though.

      Oh, and also during the Cold War the foreign country most integrated into USSR’s MIC was Finland. Not something of the Warsaw Pact ones, but Finland.

      You’re telling me they barely tolerated building warships for USSR, right? Poor guys.

      And then people in the Interwebs are asking why some average Russian doesn’t go and rebel or blow up FSB buildings or something. I wonder the fuck why.

      That’s why.

    • nialv7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      7 days ago

      If he did that that would have been genuine discrimination. If he has to do it now because of sanctions, then ok fine. But otherwise I don’t want to see an open source project treating people differently based on where they were born.

      Come on lemmy, how is this pro-racism comment upvoted so many times? Please, think.

      • Skates@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Oh no, the treaty-breaking, nuke-threatening, war-crime-committing invading force is being discriminated against!

        Holy shit, gtfo. Maybe don’t be an actual cunt if you don’t want people to “discriminate” against you? The guy didn’t even fire all Russians, only those tied to sanctioned companies. He did less than should’ve been done. But that’s only because what should be done to Russia at this point is assassinating their leader, disarming the country, executing the army, installing a puppet government that ensures economic and military inferiority, and selling tickets to piss on Putins grave for the rest of the world to blow off some steam.

        Edit: here’s a view from a Russian, maybe that helps:

        https://social.kernel.org/notice/AnIv3IogdUsebImO6i

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            We’ll let you know as soon as we find a reason to respect your malformed opinion.

          • Snowclone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            Look as long as your a NATO nation, we’re a perfectly peaceful and reasonable super power with a military that would scorch the earth to ash within 24 hours.

    • aidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      7 days ago

      It is genuine xenophobia. I like in Poland, and its like you’re either a homophobe, or a xenophobe- with pretty limited inbetween. (And there are plenty of people who are both)

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Save your sanity and do Settings -> Blocks -> Block instance -> lemmy.ml

    Also perhaps block me if you strongly disagree with the above.

  • Dayroom7485@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Yo this comment section is a dumpster fire 🔥

    edit: Remember Russian propaganda’s goal is to sabotage free discussion and conversation. They achieve this by e.g. shitting in a comment section. That might explain what’s going on here. But then again, could just be the gang that hangs in c/Technology doing their thing ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • Tux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Linus in 2012: Nvidia fuck you

    Linus in 2024: Russia fuck you

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    6 days ago

    russian economy after over 1k days of war is evaporized and putin now is Xis little dog. so if we all work together now nobody will remember a country called russia in 100 years. nations are just a phantasy and it wont hurt to let go of some.

  • hitwright@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m surprised how many people treat GPL to ignore borders. The IP law still operates only by the rules your country decides.

    I can understand the desire for information to be free, but unless Open source movement becomes it’s own country the discussion should end there.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    You have to be arguing in bad faith if you’re trying to say “citizens of nation shouldn’t be responsible for their nation”

    The open source benefit is not that they can directly impact it, it’s that their government can’t

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    You know. I don’t like what the Russian leadership and military are doing. I feel like ultimately we’re in the cold war era. But you know, at the height of the cold war, radio operators around the world still worked Russian stations.

    Yes, there was a very clear policy, neither side talked about ANYTHING beyond their signal report and working conditions (information about radio, power output and aerial basically). At the height of the actual cold war, the individuals were not cancelled like this.

    Sanction the leadership, sanction the money, and sanction the military. But the normal people that are subject to the propaganda? I don’t understand the benefit in doing this. I also don’t see how the sanctions effect an open source project…

    Seems a bit weird. Maybe there’s information we’re not privy to, but on the face of it, just based on what we’re seeing. Seems like a very very odd move.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      don’t understand the benefit in doing this.

      FSB wants backdoor in kernel. FSB notices subsystem maintainer is Russian, lives in Chelyabinsk. Can close eyes to backdoor, can pretend to review. FSB in Moscow make call to FSB in Chelyabinsk telling to buy heavy wrench at hardware store.

      • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        7 days ago

        Same could be said for any intelligence service . it is better to focus on preventing and detecting these things through analysis and code reviews.

        And they could just offer boatloads of cash to someone in another country to insert something so this doesn’t really prevent anything it only isolates a certain subset of people.

        • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          7 days ago

          So if we can’t completely 100% deal with a problem, we shouldn’t even try? I mean, you’re correct, but we can’t solve all problems at once. If we deal with at least one, then we’ve made progress. Then we can try to deal with the next one.

          • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            No but this doesn’t do anything to “deal” with the problem as anyone can built up trust like Jian tan showed. The argument that this makes us more secure is like saying closed source is more secure cause the hackers dont have access to the source.

            We have evidence of the US messing with nist standards so by that same logic should we assume all us actors are bad ?

            The solution is to verify the code maybe have multiple people from different locations have to review stuff. Build more checks into the process.

            The whole point of it being open is that it can be reviewed. It shouldn’t matter where the contributor is from as all code should be subjected to a rigorous review process.

            • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              We have evidence of the US messing with nist standards

              What… You realize that NIST is literally a government agency? It’s part of the United States Department of Commerce. It’s literally the US government. Are you saying that the government is messing with itself? What does that even mean?

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        7 days ago

        If that were true, surely they’d not trust ANY of their existing work, or at least any done since the Special War Operation. Wouldn’t that make sense?

        They’ve left the code, and removed the people arbitrarily. Seems a bit off to me.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I don’t think this only happens now, governments like Russia, USA, China, Israel will likely always be making these attempts.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      I don’t understand the benefit in doing this.

      Security. Torvalds did this for security.

      Is it really that hard to parse?

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        7 days ago

        And I’ll say the same here as I did above. If it was for security, their code is tainted too. It’s an arbitrary reaction that is not complete as a solution to anything.

        • walden@sub.wetshaving.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          They can check existing code. You have to be able to trust people who are contributing.

          They can check new code by these risky people as it comes in, but it why risk it?

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can’t untaint code if the tainters (lol that sounds funny) can still edit the code.

          If Torvalds is correct (he is), patching can now take place for vulnerabilities.

          Good point!

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well it seems it was more to do with sanctions, if the open letter from one of the chopped developers is to be believed. In which case, I think the right thing is to move the names to contributors (they did still contribute), remove them from maintainers (some maintainers are actually paid by the foundation, I mean not a lot, but some are paid).

            I still find it all a little odd. But likely there was a bit of a prod from somewhere higher as to how sanctions should be followed.

    • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I am on your side and don’t understand the fury of down votes in this section regarding this stance. I am from a shit hole of a country too and if my life long contribution to open science (hypothetically speaking) could be so completely disregarded because of something ultra shitty that my country did, I would be super sad and probably mad at the OS community for leaving me behind so quickly.

      I also don’t understand the benefit of doing this. Most people seem to claim it’s for security reasons but that does not make sense to me. Closing doors to someone without any proof of malintent is so against open source philosophy that it is perhaps more damaging in its core. And being the kind of government Russia is (or for that matter Israel, China, USA etc etc) they will always try to gain cyber war advantage by such methods. This approach is therefore clearly unsustainable. You would only be able to give dev access to a handful of countries in the world.

      It sure as hell won’t scratch a dent in the Russian government’s armor when all these sanctions did not. It is not going to achieve 1/1000th of what all those ambargoes, frozen accounts etc aimed and failed to achieve.

      Therefore there is either missing information (external pressure to take this action) or this is simply an action based on personal judgement.

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Therefore there is either missing information (external pressure to take this action) or this is simply an action based on personal judgement.

        Looking at the other post about NVidia drivers, I am starting to wonder if western governments (or perhaps just the US) are going after large orgs and suggesting how current sanctions should be interpreted. In which case, not sure I can then blame the Linux foundation, since you know, you don’t need government heavy breathing down your neck.

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    altlinux devs:
    oh come on we are not trolls