The 2024 US presidential election had been widely characterized as one of the most consequential political contests in recent US history. Although turnout was high for a presidential election – almost matching the levels of 2020 – it is estimated that close to 90 million Americans, roughly 36% of the eligible voting age population, did not vote. This number is greater than the number of people who voted for either Donald Trump or Kamala Harris.

More than a month on from polling day, eligible US voters from across the country as well as other parts of the world got in touch with the Guardian to share why they did not vote.

Scores of people said they had not turned out as they felt their vote would not matter because of the electoral college system, since they lived in a safely blue or red state. This included a number of people who nonetheless had voted in the 2020 and 2016 elections.

While various previous Democratic voters said they had abstained this time due to the Harris campaign’s stance on Israel or for other policy reasons, a number of people in this camp said they would have voted for the vice-president had they lived in a swing state.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Lol this was a 1:1 repeat of 2016.

    I voted and sat back as the Dems threw away their election by willingly ignoring their constituents in exchange for AIPAC money.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I live in a blue state but that doesn’t mean I’d be justified in believing that I should sit it out. Even if that insane logic about not needing to was valid, there’s other shit on the ballot. And even if my vote for or abstaining against an uncontested incumbent is irrelevant, there’s still ballot measures that need to be understood.

  • LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    One guy said this “VP Harris failed to demonstrate she was ethically or intellectually capable of executing the office, repeatedly failing to detail out her policies…" It’s infuriating that people continue to believe Harris never detailed her policies despite the fact that all she talked about was policy. All they had to do was pay attention to her and she would talk about her policies, it seems like they just didn’t want to even pay attention to her. Or that because she didn’t detail alllll of her policies then that wasn’t enough. Add on that this person calls her intellectually incapable of talking about her policies, basically calling her stupid and it’s just exhausting.

    This whole article continues to make me believe in the fundamental problem with Democrat voters which so many people have shown. The democrats have to run the perfect candidate with the perfect policies or the charisma of Obama who promise the world, while the Republicans can run a guy who says immigrants are eating cats and dogs and because the Democratic candidate wasn’t perfect, the Republicans win.

    And then when the Democrats do promise signficant change and it doesn’t immediately happen, Democrat voters punish them for it, they lose the midterms, and any change that was in the process of happening gets stopped dead. But when Republicans promise the world and don’t deliver, Republican voters reward them for simply promising it.

    “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.”

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Institutional vs anti institutional. Dems are institutional and the institution sucks. Trump is a sledgehammer. He promised alot of sledgehammering. Not good, but that’s irrelevant. The Dems need to stop protecting the broken system of neo liberal economics that fucking Regan invented and chasing the phantom center right vote.

      Aka. swing left or die.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    All I got from this is that Democrats, progressives, and Americans are fucking absolutely stupid regardless of education level.

    • 4grams@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, I feel like this last election was an awakening for me of exactly how stupid, selfish and ignorant this country is on average. This country is just dumb as shit and proud of it.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why are you lumping progressives in with them?

      Trump won 2 presidencies because democrats actively work against progressive agendas which would actually benefit regular people.

      • njaard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Progressives work against progressive agendas by naming pro-safety policies like “don’t have police respond to mental health patients” as the Fox-news like “defund the police”.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Not really. There’s substantial evidence to indicate that voting does not significantly impact policy.

        I think people like you are just grasping at straws to avoid admitting that you put your faith in a failing process.

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          The evidence isn’t that voting doesn’t affect things. That’s a moronic conclusion. Its that largely things the public wants are vetoed by corporate influence.

          The evidence is that voting affects things the corporate class is indifferent to- the easiest thing to point to is that the individual pet projects of candidates have an outsized effect: The invasion of Iraq being the easiest example of where the intention to create a war that hundreds of thousands died was essentially because the guy that won the 2000 election had a fixation.

      • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Not voting takes less energy than voting for someone that doesn’t represent a potential voters interests. That’s not stupid, that’s just taking the path of least resistance.

      • 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        i guess it’s similar to our system here in canada, however many ridings the party has dictates their position in the house. its really dumb because some reps might be great people, but the leader is a total dingus. I don’t know what party i am voting for because i have lost faith in all the parties in my county.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    The idea that your vote doesn’t count in a strongly red or blue state is total propaganda to get people to not vote and make it so that they don’t have to spend money on campaigning in those places. There are way more people who don’t vote than there are people who voted for either candidate in most places. If everyone voted it could easily overcome any perceived majorities. Especially if city people voted. Problem is that there isnt enough capacity to vote. And cuts to funding that capacity in red states have been a big way to discourage voting in cities. Most people can’t afford to take an entire day off of work to wait in the lines and employers wouldn’t allow it. They’re only required to give 1 hour which is barely enough to get to a poling place and back with no lines. And that isn’t enforced so many don’t even give that hour. And mail in and early voting has been framed by Republicans as unreliable with fake movies and such as propaganda even though it works great in many Blue states.

  • Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Well, they may have actual made it so about what they fear about their vote “not counting” by putting the fascists in power

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Did they interview anyone in a swing state at all, or just people who lived in solid states and suggested that if they lived in a swing state they’d have voted?

    The only reasons they gave were Israel and gesture vaguely in the direction of other policies.

    Did these non-voters not consider the downballot candidates that dems also lost their asses on?

  • ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    It looks like the “they’re both the same” disinformation from the hexbear side of the internet made a pretty strong impression. I’m not going to call it determinative by any means but it put some weight on the scale.

    I think attempting to court Never Trump voters and Haley voters was penalty the biggest mistake. They could’ve spent that time and energy trying to win workers, getting their messaging to be more “real person” instead of focus grouped.

    Like, the real solution was for Biden not to run for re-election at least, and at most to resign in February 2023 or right after signing the Infrastructure Law or chips.

    • emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Its not disinformation to say the obvious, that people are completely dissatisfied with the Democratic Party’s ineptitude and corruption. They blatantly refuse to listen to the will of their voting base. I can also guarantee nowhere near 90 million eligible voters were influenced in any way by hexbear or related sites. Those users were just telling you what you refused to listen to. That the democratic party needs to change its tactics and stop their shady money laundering and pandering to corporate interests and ruthless support of imperialism, or they wont win. But keep blaming some random internet forum, and palestinians, and anybody but the ones who made the actual decisions during the election. Decisions that alienated tens of millions of eligible voters.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pivoting from Biden to Harris guaranteed a Trump victory.

    We need a replacement for the democrat party.

    • hamFoilHat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      Biden had been showing his age for almost a year before he dropped out. That debate was his last chance to show he wasn’t having a massive mental decline, and he failed. There was no way he could have won against Trump after that.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I actually disagree. I think the debate was blown way out of proportion and most people who would’ve voted for him prior would’ve still voted to him after.

        It’s important to acknowledge that there are a lot of liars on the internet. It’s easy to make it appear that a bunch of people jumped ship from biden after the debate when you see waves of trolls saying “yeah, I was gonna vote for Biden but not after that debate!” Meanwhile, they were going to vote for Trump all along.

        That said, I still don’t think Biden had a great shot at winning because he doesn’t serve the working class or exploit their emotions.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      Pivoting to Biden in 2020 is what really sank the party in 2024. Covid won 2020 for Biden, but he thought he was something special so in 2024 he desperately clung onto power until his mental decline was too obvious for even party diehards to deny and then the party scrambled to push through Harris who was forced to adopt that bonehead’s general rhetoric. Biden would’ve lost things even harder. The party really fucked itself with Biden, but I’m sure the party thinks it was all worth it to prevent a Bernie victory.

    • njaard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Harris overtook Biden’s polling numbers quite quickly. Also, I find that Biden’s pardoning of the “kids4cash” judge demonstrates some extreme incompetence and tone deafness".

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    “The Dems are out of touch on social issues, and have tacked too far to the left to appease a minority of progressives.”

    Asshole.

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      And ignorant - they fell for the conservative talking points too

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      For those who aren’t aware already, “a minority of progressives” means “queer people,” specifically trans people.

      This asshole is saying the Dems went too far in trying to make things more equal.

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think there are a lot of progressives, but I think not enough of them live in swing states. I’m one, and I know there are some around in the college crowd. When Michigan went blue trifecta in 2022, I thought the pendulum was swinging, but now it looks like I was wrong.

      This guy might be an asshole, but I’m not certain that he’s wrong.