Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned soo many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this, and happy new year in advance.)
Hopefully 2025 will be a nice normal yearā
Cybertruck outside of Trump hotel explodes violently and no once can figure out if it was a bomb or just Cybertruck engineering
Huh. I guess itāll be another weird one.
(I know I know, low effort post, Iām sick in bed and bored)
Hey, at least thereās no way the Elon simps can spin that, right?
Never mind.
Sure, you know what, letās go with that. While obviously I donāt condone terrorism, I agree with Nic here that if you are going to do a car bombing, blowing up a Cybertruck is preferable to other cars. Because it contains the blast better or whatever.
They are also spinning it into āthe car is so great you cant do terrorism with it due to how strong it isā, which considering the several vehicle terrorism acts recently seems very unwise.
Also āit would be different for the bystandersā i think you can see on the explosion vid there were not that many bystanders (which makes terrorism a bit less likely) and still 7 people were hurt (and the driver died). Id wait a bit with drawing further conclusions.
Steel, like a pressure cooker
Somebody pointed out that I might have been wrong and steel might be a perfect shield for anything.
deleted by creator
chalk it down to perp incompetence. single direct hit with old 155mm shell (7kg explosive) can destroy a normal modern tank, nevermind a car. no amount of shitty panels would contain anything at least mildly substantial. there were cases of suicide vests with bigger charge than that (10kg) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-66355032
symbolic building (??) still makes sense as a target for terrorist attack
Sure but id expect the perp to first use the cybertruck to ram into the building, or at least move closer, and not park nicely, otoh, if he was a terrorists what do I know, dont exactly know what goes through their mind shortly before things at high speeds go through their mind.
parking like this raises less suspicion. maybe he wasnāt sure enough about whatever igniting mechanism he had, he could end up stuck in a wall unable to get out to look it up
instead of high speed disassembly dude just burned down in automatically locked death trap, i guess he found that anticlimatic. not like isis (guessing) recruits brightest minds out there
Yeah the story is about to get weird. Your isis guess might not be far off. See this same military base as the guy who drove into the crowds.
Writers of 2025: āSomehow isis returned.ā (I know isis never left, media just looked less at it, but thought it would be a funny joke).
update 2: yeah itās not that
so far what is known: active duty green beret, trumper, freshly (?) after breakup, wrote a ālist of grievancesā but itās not cited anywhere in full (maybe itās too racist for polite company). appears to be cooked in some ways. while he was a green beret he wasnāt 18C or 18B so he wasnāt specifically trained for use or handling of high explosives, (no cross-training?) he was more in business of communications, surveillance, intelligence gathering (18E, then 18F) also worked with drones and there was something about drones in that list of grievances
Thanks for the update. Damn this got very weird. Appreciate the 2025 writers throwing in a few twists. E: looks like the guy was a bit of an accelerationist fascist
iāve seen that news piece on how they were in the same base and how they were deployed in afghanistan around the same time previously and thatās what i based this guess on
still, so far it could be anything else including complete coincidence. itās like dude forgot everything, he was radioman but couldnāt make remote controlled detonator and didnāt use efficient charge for some reason
not only isis never left, i guess they controlled some territory at least until last month even if it was only a couple of villages in desert
Donāt worry about the low effort post, even the writers of 2025 are phoning it in.