ID: MUNROE @MunroeBergdorf posted: ā€œPlease donā€™t be surprised if I block you instead of engaging in ā€˜a debateā€™ about issues that donā€™t affect you, but impact on my life greatly. I do not need to, nor want to converse with people who prioritize their desire to prove a point, over my humanity and rights.ā€

Amanda Jette Knox @MunroeBergdorf replies: ā€œTHIS. You owe no one a debate on who you are, ever. Not online. Not in person. Not in the media.ā€

  • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    Ā·
    15 days ago

    The whole premise of a debate usually comes with the connotation that you will never get convinced, and that if the other person was more convincing than you, then you ā€œlostā€ and just need to be more persuasive next time.

    So yes, just telling someone their opinions are bad usually doesnā€™t work and is a waste of effort, no matter how well written and supported you are.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      Ā·
      15 days ago

      From what I can tell a lot of this is just Twitter culture. It is totally possible to have a debate where the point is exploring the ways your ideas do and donā€™t make sense rather than purely trying to ā€œwinā€ by addressing a crowd with propaganda and rhetoric, itā€™s just that the internet has trended strongly towards the latter over the years.

      I agree with OP in that I wouldnā€™t try to debate people on Twitter either. That doesnā€™t mean debate has no value though, you just need to figure out where your line is for when it isnā€™t going to be worth responding, and then do the hard part of actually committing to that.