• LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s been a huge increase in the usage of fiber optic drones by Ukranian forces in that area.

          • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            And all of this IMO is why the war in Ukraine has been allowed to continue. It’s live weapon/ technology testing for modern warfare

            I think innovation like this, that is so cheap and accessible, is terrible for the super powers. I’m imagining if this type of thing was available in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, the US would have had a MUCH worse time.

            I would think it would be in the best interests of any first world country with a tendency toward… wars away from home… to limit the advancement of technology like this.

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think innovation like this, that is so cheap and accessible, is terrible for the super powers. I’m imagining if this type of thing was available in the Iraq or Afghanistan wars, the US would have had a MUCH worse time.

              Yup, on both points. That said, we’ve only seen what disorganized and underfunded groups struggling to survive could do with the tech in Ukraine. Imagine what a superpower could bring to mass production, long range delivery and mass coordination coupled to a first class military - china or the us. And it’s going to be peer adversarial - drones sometimes take out other drones in Ukraine, in the next major conflict we’re going to see swarm vs swarm actions.

              shit’s gonna get crazy fast

        • baldingpudenda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can’t jam the signal when it’s directly connected. Think ethernet cable to wifi. The war heavily uses drones. It’s been a cat and mouse game that Ukraine has been winning and this is the latest innovation.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            But wouldn’t fiber optic cable over long distance add so much weight as to impede flight or carrying munitions? Is it shockingly lightweight?

              • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Another benefit is that most of the fiber will be on the ground as you get closer to the target. Your drone will get lighter as it flies.

                  • superkret@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    You wouldn’t want to. Lives could depend on the next drone’s mission, why risk losing it from a kink in the fiber? Also, the time putting it back on reels is better spent elsewhere. Fiber is very, very, very cheap compared to all other expenses in war. You don’t collect brass to re-load ammo on the battlefield either.

            • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Any weight at all is going to effect the drones ability, but fiber optic cables are very very lightweight, being just a wrapped strand of glass.

        • Hugin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          10 months ago

          Using wireless to control the drone makes the drone and operator very easy to detect. Controlling via fiber it’s mush harder to detect.

        • aramis87@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          tl;dr: drones can be tethered by fiber optic cables. The cable provides jam-proof communication between the drone and the operator; and it also supplies power to the drone so it doesn’t need a massive battery pack and can stay airborne longer.

          • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            10 months ago

            Fiber optic cable can’t supply power.

            They could if it was a copper wire, but then it’s even heavier.

            • aramis87@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              According to the article:

              In the case of drones, the fiber optic cable provides a direct, stable, and high-capacity link for both power and data transmission. […] The fiber optic cable also supplies power to the drone, meaning the UAV doesn’t need a huge battery onboard.

              • zbyte64@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                10 months ago

                Maybe this is why we shouldn’t have AI write articles. Does the drone have a solar panel on the other end of the cable?

              • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                10 months ago

                I have to imagine the article is just wrong about this part, but maybe there’s something I’m missing.

                • aramis87@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Power Over Fiber “is a technology in which a fiber-optic cable carries optical power, which is used as an energy source rather than, or as well as, carrying data”.

                  • aard@kyu.de
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Now I’d recommend looking up how much power can be transported by the very few implementations out there, and how much they cost.

                    Anything coming close to being able to power a drone would need way thicker fibers, increasing the drone weight. Any too big bend would set the fiber on fire. And it costs so much that building a slightly bigger drone with more batteries is cheaper.

      • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ukraine has had a lot of success using remotely operated suicide drones. They are cheap, built mostly from off the shelf hobbyist grade components, but with a few inexpensive upgrades the signal goes for miles. Strap a grenade on the bottom or any kind of bomb with an impact fuse and you have an excellent remote control weapon.

        So of course the Russians start deploying radio jammers to block the drone signals.

        The solution to this is fiber optics. The drone carries a giant spool of hair thin fiber optic cable which sends control commands from the operator and video back from the drone. Because it’s a cable, it’s immune to jamming.

        The cable is insanely thin, usually in the tens of microns thickness. So they don’t bother recovering the cable, drone flies out spooling out cable behind it, hits its target and blows up, operator just detaches that fiber and pulls out another drone with another spool of cable to start again. This leaves tons of little fibers laying around on the countryside because every drone leaves one in its path.

        That’s the point of this video. Most of those fibers have a dead Russian soldier at the end of them.