a drawing of a person wearing a balaclava and holding a gun with the text ā€œall my homies hate tankiesā€ :3

  • gravityowl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Should I work with Marxist-Leninists?

    If youā€™re organising at work or around housing issues, the people you work with are not going to all have the same politics at you, and your opinions on the July 1918 uprising of Left Socialist Revolutionaries after their expulsion from the Bolshevik government are not relevant to that situation. Yes, really, no-one gives a shit. Youā€™re relating to each other as workers in that situation, not as representatives of a political niche, at least we hope not.

    [ā€¦]

    If there are real political and organisational disagreements, itā€™s better to be open about them than gloss over them, and retain some independence.

    • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      12
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      tankie colloquially refers to communists who deluded themselves into thinking authoritarianism can breed anything other than opression and that to give power to the people, you first got to take it away from the people.

      its not impossible to work with tankies on low stake joined causes but with their usually hierarchical and authoritarian organising structures (that they even try to spread) they still make for shitty partners.

      their idelology is misguided and harmful. i hope they all eventually learn and become anarchists. power to the people

      • el_bhm@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        tankie colloquially refers to communists who deluded themselves into thinking authoritarianism can breed anything other than opression and that to give power to the people, you first got to take it away from the people.

        That is probably the most on point description.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      13
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      A former roommate of mine had a hysterical emotional breakdown, and spent the following 2 months convincing everyone we both knew that I was mentally unstable to the point of needing to be institutionalizedā€¦

      ā€¦ because I laughed in his face when he described Hu Jintao being very publically arrested at a mass televised CCP conferenceā€¦ as ā€˜being put into witness protection due to a threat on his lifeā€™.

      ā€¦

      You see, the problem with Tankies is that theyā€™re astoundingly insecure, extremely manipulative, and fully believe in any means justifying their ends.

      Tankie roommates: Not even once.

      • gravityowl@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        While I do genuinely feel sorry that this roommate of yours behaved in such awful and shitty way, my point was about the larger communities as a whole. Especially now that there are openly fascist people in power in the US and in a lot of other countries, I believe itā€™s even more important to be united. Or at least, as I quoted before, know where the differences lie.

        That doesnā€™t mean being supportive of wrong behaviors and/or people of course. Being critical of wrongdoing is an essential skill. But in my opinion one canā€™t be as critical when generalizing about such large groups

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Iā€™ll continue to trust Tankies as much as the historical record indicates Anarchists should.

          Which is 0, less than 0, some negative amount.

          If you know of any historical revolutionary movements involving a distinct and significant amount of Anarchists that did not include Tankies betraying and/or murdering all their Anarchist ā€˜alliesā€™, please let me know.

          EDIT: Here, I can ā€˜read more theory, noobā€™ too

          https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/ziq-tankies-and-the-left-unity-scam

          • Sonori@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            I may not be an Anarchist, but iā€™m sure saving that link. Thanks.

    • el_bhm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      7
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Tankies are fascists. You can argue all you want for pro-lgbt and anti-racist action. Community actions. This is individuals.

      What rises through the ranks is fascists. And they want those fascists. Because fascists promise an utopia at the end.

      And this is who fascists elect.

  • lemonSqueezy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    6
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Ugh this type of bullshit infighting within leftist spaces is about as serious as debating your tabletop RPG actions, and sends regular people packing. None of this shit matters. Real people donā€™t care about it and they have no idea what a tankie is. Feds love this bullshit. Weā€™re losing, we lost, the world is becoming a fascist hellscape but apparently somebody has time to make memes about fighting each other. Itā€™s amazing how that always seems to happen, especially now when youā€™d think most people could feel unified?

    • spujb@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      9
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      disagree i think itā€™s

      a) fun

      b) helpful to be aware of the stakes at play. authoritarianism has hurt many people and it does no justice to be quiet about that.

      c) something that doesnā€™t even happen that often anyway so like idc

    • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      13
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      yknow what feds love? hierarchical organisations, where they just gotta assassinate or compromise the leader to make it fall appart or coopt the entire organisation.

      but real talk discussions like this are valuable for voicing real criticism against harmful ā€œleftistā€ ideologies and through that developing our own views more wholistically. and this is important. you cant only criticise fascists, neo-liberals, and fudalists, or you might miss out on the underlying criticisms and will reproduce their flaws because of that. and while tankies might be able to do similar work as anarchists in the here and now, they are still flawed and this will only get worse, the more power they get. this discussion is important to any real person, who because of it wont fall for the lie of authoritarianism or might even escape it.

      and this world is turning fascist but tankies are cheering on half of them. you know what sends regular people packing? support for china, the soviet union, and north korea. authoritarianism takes the credibility away from libratory struggles.

      also its just good to vent frustrations sonetimesā€¦

      • kaprap@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Calling them something else is a stretch, all but their geopolitical beliefs are leftist

    • jaemo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      apparently somebody has time to make memes

      A) to be fair, memes are the principal monetization strategy of the internet

      B) there is a factory somewhere that is mass producing injection-molded fake dog shit out of plastic and this post is the thing that gets your hackles up about an ineffectual expenditure of time, thought and human capital?

    • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      To fix everything people gotta stop being tribalist idiots. Lol!! Maybe try to get murdoch and Koch the memo

  • SomeLemmyUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Most communists/socialists arent tankies (even if .ml tries really hard to convince everyone otherwise) but identify with hammer and sickle too :(

    But fk tankies, Iā€™m with you on that

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I donā€™t agree with the vision of an authoritarian state, even as a step towards something else, but my tankie friends, for example those in PSL, are doing a ton of good on the ground by organizing and funding busses to prison for the families of prisoners, helping support tenant unions, providing support for immigrants in the form of legal representation, continuously organizing against police injustices (especially in cases involving disabled, black, or queer people), and other issues that might arise in their locale. I respect the people continuously putting themselves and their resources on the line for others. I would be much quicker to lend disrespect to those that only talk and do nothing.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Are they doing this to support the organization of a politburo and a direct line of authority from a single charismatic leader at the top? Do they make apoligistic statements for human injustices and advocate for the expansion of borders through war?

      Otherwise theyā€™re just communists doing rad communist shit and you should labor to help them organize and shoulder their burdens.

      I think there is a general misconception of communists especially here in the US and itā€™s been a problem in leftist circles for a while.

      • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        PSL is marxist-leninist in ideology and doing all the activities I described. Perhaps way in the future I will have to fight with them, but for now we align on many issues and work side by side. Donā€™t allow propaganda to paint too broad of strokes.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        What lmao? The people who you call tankies are aggressively pro union. Find me a ā€œtankieā€ site that thinks otherwise.

        And you would call the PSL tankies. Hereā€™s a Wikipedia excerpt from their page:

        International affairs

        PSL calls for a 90% cut to the military budget of the United States, the closure of all overseas military bases, and a halt of US aid to Israel.

        PSL supports the Workerā€™s Party of North Korea. PSL describes North Korea as a ā€œcommunist governmentā€ and North Korea as ā€œone of the few top-to-bottom, actually-existing, alternatives to the global capitalist systemā€. PSL has defended North Koreaā€™s human rights record against criticism by the United Nations, which it calls ā€œthinly veiled justification for U.S. aggression toward North Koreaā€, and argues that ā€œconditions in North Korea are vastly better than those in other developing countriesā€. PSL supports North Koreaā€™s nuclear weapons program.

        PSL supports the Communist Party of China, criticizing only Chinese economic reforms into a ā€œmarket socialist economyā€. PSL argues that ā€œmilitant political defense of the Chinese governmentā€ is necessary to stave off ā€œcounterrevolution, imperialist intervention and dismembermentā€. PSL defends Chinaā€™s human rights record, and strongly denies that the Peopleā€™s Liberation Army massacred peaceful student protestors in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. PSL denies that China has suppressed democracy in Hong Kong. PSL has praised the 1950ā€“1951 annexation of Tibet and defended the status of Human Rights in Tibet under the administration of China, claiming that ā€œprogress made [since the annexation] has revolutionized life for Tibetans.ā€

        PSL supported the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea. PSL did not support the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, but blamed the invasion on NATO and the United States. In its statement on ā€œRussiaā€™s military interventionā€, PSL highlighted the ā€œplight of ethnic Russians [ā€¦] in the Donbasā€, Russiaā€™s ā€œlegitimate security concernsā€, and NATOā€™s ā€œprovocative behaviorā€.

        PSL opposes US intervention in the Syrian Civil War, and has generally been supportive of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and Russian military efforts in Syria. PSL denies that the Syrian government used chemical weapons.

        • Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          If someone calls themselves a tankie and they dont understand where the term tankie comes from, theyre either not telling the truth or are not worth talking to hecause they dont understand their own ideology.

    • Comrade Spood@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      22 days ago

      PSL has defended abusers and harassed victims for speaking up, have policed and harassed the members for liking and sharing things that donā€™t follow the partyā€™s strict platform, and have ruined actions that could have made real change all because they care more about public image than actual effective action. PSL is a cult, your friends are in a cult, and you are advocating for a cult.

      https://docs.google.com/document/u/0/d/14wF1Ti5GT2w5GZmwqvhvk6uH4zUss_a-B2GZ9NZEx74/mobilebasic

      https://fashbusters.wordpress.com/2020/12/30/psl-stalked-doxxed-harassed-steven-powers-accuser/

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    I love my anarchist comrades and I love my communist comrades. I hate seeing memes like this. May we all be lucky enough to argue in the midst of a real revolution. Until then, focus on the fucking fascists.

    • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Unity above all else. Absolutely. However Tankie rhetoric in good faith or from an agent provocateur is something that needs to be addressed directly. Any power structure without egalitarian praxis is antithetical to the movement. Communism and Anarchism are very similar to the point where there are anarcho communists.

      I want to make sure that there is space for us to figure out self governance immediately after the revolution. I donā€™t want to rely on a nascent ā€œinterimā€ government to hand it down to me.

      https://viewpointmag.com/2018/06/11/intercommunalism-the-late-theorizations-of-huey-p-newton-chief-theoretician-of-the-black-panther-party/#f 9945 1 6

      • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Anarcho communism just makes sense. If communism is a moneyless, classless, stateless society, is it not by default anarchist as well?

        And Iā€™m not referring to any of the so called ā€œcommunistā€ countries because theyā€™re all variations of socialist and not communist. They all have a state.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Iā€™m someone with a leg in both tendencies, as it were. I purposely avoid getting too into the theory weeds, in favor of interacting with actual people. I see the word ā€œtankieā€ used veeerrryyy liberally lately, and it feels like it doesnā€™t signify very much. Respectfully, thinking about ā€œimmediately after the revolutionā€ is getting way ahead of yourself, at least in relation to who you work with today.

      • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        we dont need power to the people after some magical revolution somewhere in the future. we need to prefigure non-hierarchical structures in the here and now, and while even building the capacity for violent insurrection.

        i dont trust a revolutionairy army, that is build on authoritairian principles, to give power away to a newly forming anarchist society, once in power. if all that people know is hierarchy, thats the structures they will tend to recreate.

        looking at real revolutionairy movements, it appears to me that they either turn anarchist during the prolonged struggle or forever stay authoritairian despite their best efforts.

        • inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Hear you on this. Most people just want to be on the top of the hierarchy which is at least partly why none of the so called ā€œcommunistā€ countries ever actually achieved it.

          Most people canā€™t fathom a lack of hierarchy. Even in interpersonal relationships.

          The parent above the child. The boss above the worker. The principal above the teacher. The husband above the wife. Etc etc. thatā€™s why queer people are so attacked, besides the ā€œweā€™re not normalā€ part, we upend hierarchical beliefs. Iā€™m a lesbian, and when Iā€™m dating someone, thereā€™s always a hetero (who is queer friendly, just stupid!) asking whoā€™s the ā€œmanā€ in the relationship. None! Thatā€™s the point!

          We have to get over a lifetime of conditioning. Iā€™ve always been anarchist since I was young - when I was 4, I became vegetarian. My reasoning, at four: why is a dog more valuable than a cow? If I wouldnā€™t eat my dog why would I eat a cow? And you know what, 32 years later I still abide by that logic.

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The thing is historically leftists ally with anarchists until they get power and then they execute the anarchists. They want unity as long as itā€™s convenient for their agenda, but thatā€™s true of any philosophy that encourages power structures of any kind.

        • horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Historically yes. Any transition of power is a dangerous time. Thereā€™s a history of communists factions and bad faith actors working with fascists in Italy to murder anarchists who were planning to kill Mussolini. However thatā€™s not a conversation thatā€™s necessary this very second. Stratification of power and the way in which itā€™s weilded is not lost on me. The problem with people that make bombs is sometimes the only cause they have is the one that necessitates bombings.

          • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            ā€œHowever thatā€™s not a conversation thatā€™s necessary this very secondā€

            ā€œTrust me bro we wonā€™t kill you immediately afterwards, just do what helps us and youā€™ll be fine, trust me broā€

            Kinda feels like what the DNC told Bernie supporters the past 10 years.

        • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          This.

          Also, tankies are that not because theyā€™re communists (theyā€™re not, no matter how hard they insist) but because they support an oppressor on the same scale as the one they demand we unite with them to oppose, simply because said oppressor calls themselves communist (again, theyā€™re not), seemingly without understanding how that might make those of us opposed to all oppression mistrust them, and be unwilling to simply overlook their values and actions.

          • Shyfer@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            On the other hand, I always see people who use the term tankies calling everyone who the US propaganda says is an oppressor an oppressor. Itā€™s so weird how that works out that way, that the colonized countries trying to get self-determination are the oppressors, and the western colonial and imperialist countries are the only ones with ā€œfreedomā€. They eat the propaganda right up.

            • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              Ā·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I think you mean liberals.

              Iā€™m an anarchist.

              Fuck tankies (E: who do exactly what youā€™re accusing others of doing to them - licking Chinese boot instead of American doesnā€™t make one any better than the other)

    • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      ive been in action with tankies and they were a pain in the butt, making decisions that affect all of us hierarchically and not sharing info, just expecting us to do whatevever their leaders decide

      better than nothing maybe but i wish they were cooler

  • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    10
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Yep just keep punching left šŸ˜®ā€šŸ’Ø

    "First they came for the **socialists**, and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a socialist.
    
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a trade unionist.
    
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak outā€”because I was not a Jew.
    
    Then they came for meā€”and there was no one left to speak for me."
    
    ā€”Martin Niemƶller
    

    Source

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Iā€™m deep left libertarian, borderline anarchist, but if I have to make a choice between auths- tankies or Nazis- Iā€™ll take tankies every time.

  • SectoidLexi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    The meme is well designed, love the chaos star especially and love to see more balaclava girlies. And I can sympathize as Iā€™ve certainly encountered very bizarre takes by terminally online internet leftists in favor of weird shit like being in favor of the Ukraine invasion or thinking the DPRK is some secret paradise.

    However, by and large Iā€™ve gotten to the point where anytime I hear the term ā€˜tankieā€™ thrown around it feels thought terminating. Iā€™ve been called a tankie for being opposed to the US invading North Korea, or for supporting indigenous land return. But hereā€™s a bigger problem Iā€™ve encountered: I volunteer every week at a local free store run by anarchists and I also have done organizing work with local ML parties. Anytime the local MLs want to get involved in the free store, or collaborating on any mutual aid projects the Anarchists have going on its cold shoulders all around ā€œOh no, those people are Tankies. We canā€™t trust them.ā€ Itā€™s gotten to the point where everything is separate and thereā€™s no talking to each other. One time a Communist party member mentioned they knew someone who could do free glasses repair and thought it would be good for them to come to the free store, and when I brought it up folks just didnā€™t wanna hear it or criticized ā€œthe company I keepā€ as if that would taint them. Itā€™s just disheartening because all these MLs locally are almost all LGBTQ, poor/working class, disabled, etc. Just like the Anarchists and want a lot of the same things. I really think anti-communist propaganda has created such an unnecessary divide in our organizing. Iā€™m not asking folks to all just get along and agree, I want different orgs to have their autonomy and own ways of thought. I would just want people to focus their ire on people who ACTUALLY make life shit for us, especially here in the west, which is our own capitalist state and the capitalist class.

    Thank you for indulging me by reading my long silly comment.

    • Comrade Spood@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      22 days ago

      The chaos star comes from before Warhammer. It comes from the Elric of MalnibonƩ books by Michael Moorcock (unfortunate last name lol). The symbol has been adopted by anarcho-nihilists, which is the context for this usage

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        His star is actually different.

        The Moorcock star is 8 outwards arrows with radial symmetry (not very chaotic to have symmetry but weā€™ll get to that)

        Games Workshop (whose early writers were largely anarchist and heavily inspired by Moorcock) added a circle to the symbol, with the arrows escaping the bounds (like in the anarchy A). Theyā€™re also often, but not always, asymmetrical. Also, sometimes itā€™s not! Sometimes itā€™s just Moorcockā€™s! Chaos, bitch! Thereā€™s specific meaning behind a lot of the differences but itā€™s not relevant.

        Thatā€™s the Games Workshop Chaos Star. Period. It even has similar arrowhead design to the arrow heads used directly on the figures.

        For reference, this is a particularly complicated Warhammer Chaos Star:

        Note in particular the lines on the outside of the circle, in between the main 8 arrows.

        Anarchists arenā€™t the only ones that use the star btw:

        Which is why I downvoted this shit, as it happens. Real anarchists arenā€™t ripping off corporate symbols to beef with Marxists in 2025.

        Not the smart ones, anyways. Thereā€™s plenty of black fascists running around, red fascists are going to have to take a number.

        That all said, I havenā€™t read a lot of Moorcock, compared to way too much Warhammer. If youā€™re saying they got their variations from Moorcock too Iā€™ll believe you.

        • Comrade Spood@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          Anarcho-nihilists and insurrectionary anarchists are the ones typically using the symbol, and they donā€™t usually care if its the Moorcock one or the Games Workshop one. Wonā€™t deny, yeah this oneā€™s the Games Workshop version. But I also think its basically arguing semantics whether theyā€™re using the Moorcock one, an anarcho-nihilist one, or a GW one. Whether its the GW one or not is sorta irrelevant (I was just trying to provide some history and context, wonā€™t deny I missed the circle which does make it the GW version), as its clearly being used in an anarchist context. All I was saying was Moorcock is credited with the original, and Games Workshop were directly inspired by Moorcock and also used it. However I do not feel its fair to equate op or anyone that uses the symbol to fascists. Yes some use the chaos star but it is a very specific and niche version of it.

          I also donā€™t think its a good idea to just give up the symbol because a couple irrelevant basement dwelling fascists try to use a niche version of the chaos star. Iā€™m tired of leftists just letting fascists take symbols away without a fight. I donā€™t see Marxists dropping the hammer and sickle cause NazBols use it.

          Lastly, anarchists are certainly beefing with tankies. And they are going to use their symbols to do it. Chaos star included because it is an anarchist symbol whether you agree with its use or not. I have it on my punk jacket, I am a very clear anarchist, and I very much have beef with tankies because I see them as fascists with a red coat of paint.

  • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    11
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Iā€™m tired of this red scare bs. It belongs in history books, not on the internet.

    • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      14
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      this has nothing to do with red scare. tankies suck and its not because capitalist states say so

      • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        11
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Can you define what a ā€œtankieā€ is? It absolutely is red scare bs. No one calls themselves that.

        • Russty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          People who cheered the tanks rolling into the Czech Republic and Hungaryā€¦theyā€™re the same ones hoping Russia would roll over Ukraine to spite the liberal world order. Tankies are alive and well.

          • kaprap@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            Tankies consider both to be awful (my experience), they want a weakened order for communism to restart international revolutions (what I read)

      • ShareMySims@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        9
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Also, tankies simply arenā€™t communists.

        Liberals not being able to tell the difference (E: or tankies in denial) doesnā€™t make this anti communist.

  • yuri@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    i deffo hate some tankies, in the same way that i deffo hate some vegetarian/vegans when they actively chase people away for seemingly no reason. sometimes though i do feel like i see more blind hate for entire communities than actual worthwhile discussion.

    i guess the problem could really just come down to your definition of ā€œtankieā€. to some folks itā€™s a very specific kind of obvious troll, and to others itā€™s just anyone on an .ml instance.

    and not to turn it into a ā€œlesser evilā€ discussion, but between .world and .ml, i definitely know which which meme community iā€™m hanging out in. iā€™ve yet to have a single bad interaction with anyone in .ml communities, but i also donā€™t talk politics in fucken marxist/leninist spaces either. YMMV hahahah

      • yuri@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        fair! but i do worry the term is at risk of being overused to the point of no longer having a cohesive meaning.