• Caveman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Canals and trains are still the two of the most important parts of the goods transport network. It’s not a good analogy, cities who finished the canals and trains did better.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If only tax money were were funding the datacenters.

    We should be TAXING THE DATACENTERS

  • Agent641@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    So, not finishing much-hyped projects is a species thing and not just a personal flaw of mine?

    Good to know, I think?

      • MrEff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Totally random and fun fact- Chinatown (the hard boiled detective movie) had a sequel written with the troubled detective investigating a dirty judge who was paid off by the car companies to allow them to buy up and tear out the trolly system in LA in favor of their highway designs. The judge had his own possy who acted as enforcers for the car company as they pushed their scheme to force the colored section of town to sell their land and make way for the highways.

        The sequel didn’t happen, but the script was rewritten into what we now know as Who Framed Rodger Rabbit?. If you go back and rewatch it knowing that, it all makes so much more sense. The cartoon facade is just the face for the dirty truth of what happened in America in the 1950’s, but add in the happy ending of stopping the dirty judge and saving the ‘colored’ toon town.

      • Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s a bit like here in the UK. There used to be a lot more rail tracks but got removed, presumably when cars because common and lorries were capable of carrying large amounts of goods.

        It’s a huge shame because a lot of places which were connected no longer are. I would love to be able to hop on a train and get to smaller rural areas rather than large towns and cities on a route which heads to London and back.

        There is some success though, if anybody is interested then look at Swanage railway. They managed to get everything undone and reconnect to the national network and is now a hotspot for old steam engines.

        • sonofearth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Well you Britishers gave us Indians a huge ass railway network and we have been expanding it ever since. Only if our politicians and bureaucrats were decent, we would have added higher speed trains and bullets trains to it as well instead of having shitty airlines and dangerous bus rides.

  • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    When the internet dot com boom happened telecom infrastructure providers were putting more lines into the ground than there was demand for it since they predicted that growth would accelerate. But then the bubble burst and the overcapacity was not used for years aka dark fiber. But then growth picked up again and since there were already lines in the ground the growth on demand wasn’t putting pressure on supply and thus companies could buy bandwidth very cheaply. This will probably happen with all these datacenters when the bubble bursts. The big tech companies will retreat, scale down investments and leave these datacenters underutilized. Either they will sell their assets or rent it out cheaply and thus startups and smaller companies can use the overcapacity at a low cost.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Fiber is a super special case as just about the only infrastructure material that can sit in the ground for 20 years unmaintained, and then get connected to state of the art endpoints and work at modern standards.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The difference between dark fiber and datacenters is that datacenters need a company with enough revenue to maintain the structure. Most data centers are built like big box stores: super cheaply and not meant to last more than a couple of decades while in active use for their intended purpose. You know that Shopko or K-mart that shut down 5 years ago and is still empty? You see how quickly that building has started falling apart with no company large enough to own the space and maintain it? That’s what empty datacenters are going to be like.

      Fiber on the other hand is just strands of glass with some material covering it to prevent light leaks and provide strength. As long as that glass is unbroken there is zero maintenance required whether the fiber is in use or not. Fiber also has theoretically infinite bandwidth (they’re currently working towards releasing 1.2 terrabit transceivers) and usually when fiber is run they run a big fat cable with dozens of not hundreds of strands of fiber so there’s dozens if not hundreds of times the amount of bandwidth of a single pair of strands (and lots of spare strands should a few be broken). Sure old fiber won’t be made with the tight tolerances that we have for fiber made today, so you might only get a few gigabit out of a single pair, but that’s still a ton of basically free bandwidth just sitting there as dark fiber that you can use to get off the ground then start running your own once you have some cashflow

      • epyon22@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That and most of the cost of the data centers revolve around the servers and support for those servers ie. Cooling, power racks ect. I’ve heard it can be cheaper to build a whole new building than bringing one, even currently operating one, up to new specs.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          This is also extremely true!

          Those AI servers are probably a discounted cost of around 3-5k per U (I’m probably low in this estimate but I have a really hard time believing they’re actually paying $20k+ per GPU), probably about 40U per rack is actually loaded with servers, so if we round the footprint of a server rack to 4 square feet (because I don’t feel like actually calculating it out right now) that’s about $30,000-50,000 per square foot.

          I have a hard time imagining any kind of structure costing anywhere near 1 order of magnitude less than the cost per square foot of the servers

          • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Those AI servers are probably a discounted cost of around 3-5k per U (I’m probably low in this estimate but I have a really hard time believing they’re actually paying $20k+ per GPU),

            They’re arranging 72 Blackwell GPUs into each server rack, at around a price of $3 million, in a cabinet that is 2236mm x 600 mm x 1068mm. That’s approximately a 7 square foot footprint, so about $430,000 per square foot of server. There’s obviously a need for spacing between servers, but you’re basically underestimating by an order of magnitude.

    • End-Stage-Ligma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      You mean as long as I don’t get laid off and stay in good health for the next few years I won’t have to choose between food and RAM anymore? Sounds too good to be true.

    • CarrotsHaveEars@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Interesting. Let me try one.

      Step 1, atomic bomb is very powerful
      Step 2, everyone rushes to build atomic bombs
      Step 3, ???
      Step 4, everyone can use cheap nuclear power

      The difference between dot-com boom and AI boom is that dot-com caused massive hiring at the beginning at ridiculous salaries, and dropped back to normal demand. It didn’t cause massive layoffs and force remaining workers to overwork.

      Both managements are stupid. The dot-com management only lost their own money, but AI management made people leave their own country penniless in the worst case.

  • quick_snail@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, they’ll be great places to provide free housing to the homeless.

    Err, no. ICE will probably just hollow them out and turn them into concentration camps.

    Guess it depends which way the pendulum swings.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        92
        ·
        2 days ago

        They did keep and expand on the rail routes! The US had an awesome rail network, including extensive passenger rail, until roughly the 1950s.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          69
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yup, large automakers bought up a lot of rail lines, especially local inter- and intracities, and tore out the tracks as part of the highway program. My hometown had extensive tram lines (and a halfway built subway that we ran out of money for in the 20s) that got ripped up when I75 got built.

          A lot of cities also just did this of their own accord, partially to enforce segregation and redlining. Awful harder for black and brown people to get to your Rich White Neighborhood if there’s no train or bus service to easily take them there.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Yup, large automakers bought up a lot of rail lines, especially local inter- and intracities, and tore out the tracks as part of the highway program.

            Not quite! Railroads were built using land grants, so they’d literally build cities along their lines to sell the real estate they got for free at inflated prices. Privately owned and maintained right of way is unsustainably expensive, so once the land grants ran out railroads had to continuously scramble to find a way to operate profitably. At the second half of the 19th century they began consolidating and building trunk lines for increasingly massive locomotives, in the mid 20th century they began using diesels to further reduce costs and in the late 20th century they found technologies and advanced freight routing techniques to further squeeze costs. Now in the 21st century they haven’t yet found the next way to remain profitable so we shall see what they do.

            The auto industry spent until about the end of the Great Depression selling farmers and ruralites on cars, partnering with cycling advocacy groups to lobby governments to pave existing public roads (passing the infrastructure cost to the government instead of themselves). Then as they sold more vehicles they turned their customers into their lobbyists through auto clubs like the AAA to encourage better infrastructure for cars in cities, and by the time the Federal Highway Act was passed everyone involved had already grown up with automobiles everywhere on publicly funded roads.

            There were a handful of documented instances of the auto industry buying and mismanaging interurban and trolley routes, but trolleys were already on the decline before the auto industry even got their feet under them because they also were built via land grants and real estate speculation the exact same way that railroads were built! This stopped being viable not long after it stopped being viable for the railroads. Trolley services were built to share the streets with pedestrians, cyclists and horse carriages, and the streets were simply not built to separate the incompatible traffic of automobiles and trolleys, so once automobiles outnumbered trolleys the traffic became too much to be able to run reliable trolley service and the death spiral was unstoppable

            The final nail in the coffin for rail passenger service was in 1968 when the US Postal Service ended mail contracts with the railroads, daily passenger service to every city ceased to be financially viable. Before that point, railroads would run at least one train a day with an RPO, and if they’re already running a crew out there why not also bring some freight and passengers along too?

            Then of course in the 1970s the ill-fated Penn Central collapsed in the second largest bankruptcy in US history (and nearly collapsed the entire North American rail system in the process!) which is where Conrail and Amtrak came in, federally owned entities to keep vital rail service operating. Conrail was eventually sold off into what’s now CSX and Norfolk Southern and Amtrak remains, constantly kneecapped by competing private interests (like remember that time Amtrak ran profitable freight service? Yeah the private railroads really didn’t like being outshined by Amtrak!)

          • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Americans aren’t car brained, they’re trapped in a system they didn’t build and can’t control.

            • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              A distinction without a difference.

              A mouse raised in a cage will be cage-brained.

              Too many USAians can’t imagine life without driving a car, the same way that mouse can’t imagine a forest.

              • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                How do you expect someone to imagine life without a car, when they live in an area where you have to drive three miles to get to the nearest store, and there are no sidewalks or bike lanes?

                Can you really shame the caged mouse for being unable to imagine a forest?

                • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Are we shaming them? I’m just acknowledging they can’t even conceive of an alternate future, which I think what “car-brained” is getting at.

                  But it’s a bit like the copper tops in the Matrix–they’ll always potentially be your enemy, through no fault of their own. For instance, these car brained people you are so eager to have sympathy for will show up in droves to complain about anything that would even theoretically lengthen their car commute by even a microsecond.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            large automakers bought up a lot of rail lines, especially local inter- and intracities, and tore out the tracks as part of the highway program

            Large automakers built privately-funded highways? I didn’t know that.

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 days ago

        Something something forcing a shiny, new technology into places it doesn’t belong so that big corporations could profit, disrupting whole communities, and causing massive environmental and health problems. Can’t quite put my finger on what the analogy might be, though…

        • GraniteM@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s also a fundamental infrastructure problem in that it’s more impressive to say “I’ve just signed off on this impressive new project on which we are breaking ground” than to say “We are continuing or maintaining the project that the last guy built.” New is sexy. Old and functional is boring.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Until you make the old a source of pride. “I will continue the great legacy of protecting our cherished subway system and strive to make it more accessible to all” is great.

    • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s fair, and personally I love the idea too, but as someone who grew up in a city with a major commercially-significant canal, it’s a bit overrated in reality and you are probably underestimating the traffic chaos it causes. Bridges can cause huge delays, are vulnerable to extremely dangerous allisions, and strictly limit the size of ship that can get through the canal. Even with tunnels, which likewise limit the size of truck that can go through, the constant maintenance (and cost, and lack of expandability over time) is a real bummer. If you’re willing to limit it to relatively small ships like they do in Europe it’s potentially manageable without too much fuss, but if you want big bulkers and container ships traveling deep inland you’re going to find your road network ends up chopped up into loosely connected islands with big delays and traffic bottlenecks real quick. It’s a pretty big compromise.

      Trains do a much better job of interoperating and coexisting with existing road networks without majorly disrupting them. (and for what it’s worth, canals mess up train networks just as bad if not worse than they mess up road networks)

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I live right near a canal that was completed in 1832, and it was essential and a massive success.

    Many people know the story of Canada (or Britain and its North American colonists) burning down the White House. It wasn’t just the White House though, it was a bunch of public buildings in Washington including the White House, the Capitol and the Washington Navy Yard. What people don’t know is that this was in retaliation for the Americans burning and looting York (today’s Toronto), which was at that point a small town and the capital of the province of Upper Canada. The Americans broke the laws of war when they did that, so there was a temptation to do the same to them in Washington, but cooler heads prevailed and only the public buildings were burned.

    After the war of 1812 ended, the British realized how vulnerable Canada was to the Americans. In particular, the only way to ship things from Montreal to the strategically important towns to the west (Kingston, York, etc.) was down the Saint Lawrence seaway, and the Americans controlled the lower bank of that route. As a result, the British decided to build the Rideau Canal, so goods could be shipped from Montreal to Kingston (and then from there onto the Great Lakes) while avoiding the choke points on the St. Lawrence.

    The Canal was finished in 1832 and it was a huge success. Not only did it protect Canadian shipping from a possible US attack, it also avoided all the rapids, etc. on the St. Lawrence. For a few decades it was the main way to move goods and people west, allowing for areas to the west of Montreal to be settled. Canada’s capital, Ottawa, wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for the Rideau Canal. Kingston, at the mouth of the Canal gained a lot of economic significance because of the Canal and was a unified Canada’s capital from 1841 to 1844. And Toronto was settled by people moving through the Canal, it nearly doubled in size between 1832 and 1834.

    By the late 1850s, a railway was built between Bytowne / Ottawa and the St. Lawrence, and this railway was used instead of the canal. But, the demand might not have existed for the railway if people hadn’t been able to move west thanks to the canal.

    It may be that people saw the success of that canal, and of other important canals, and that there was an overbuilding as a result of that. And, that when the railways came there was a more effective way of doing some of the same things. But, canals were incredibly important for a few decades and shape the world we live in now. So, how dare you compare them to AI datacentres, you jerk.

    • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      And despite the canal not being heavily used for shipping anymore, it can provide lots of community value for water sports and winter skating. I don’t know that obsolete data centres will bring us this degree of recreation

      • turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Surgeon General RFK suggests kids get a minimum of 5 hours a day climbing on old server racks in abandoned facilities

  • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m thinking data centres might be like landlines. For a while they were the only option, but then mobiles came along.

    In today’s context, the mobile is analogous to a fast home computer that can run AI locally.

    We might end up with more telephone exchanges than we need.

    (for the international audience, mobile = cell phone / handy; landline = inland phone, PSTN.)

    Similar analogy can apply to trains etc.

        • LumpyPancakes@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yes, I heard that name for them on QI years ago. “Mein Handy” - though not sure if they spell it handy or handie.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fun fact: the “walkie talkie” was the backpack radio (scr-300) in WWII, and the smaller handheld (scr-536) was the “handie talkie”, but the former became the common phrase phrase used for handheld radios.

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      My ideal scenario:

      • As technology improves, it becomes increasingly easy to run AI locally at home.
      • The hardware companies/data center AI companies eventually fuck each other over because big corporations always fuck everyone else over eventually and it stops becoming profitable.
      • NVIDIA etc. come crawling back to the consumer market, offering things at reasonable prices again. Data centers sell off all their shit and absolutely flood the market with cheap RAM & graphics cards.
      • Some other company has started making the hardware in the meantime and the public tells NVIDIA to go fuck themselves and we watch them go into a slow IBM style decline.

      Although what will probably happen is the companies will fuck each other over, prices will stay high forever and the data centers that go out of business will just burn all their hardware and all of this will have meant nothing.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        As technology improves, it becomes increasingly easy to run AI locally at home.

        Yes, but what ai? Yes, more models will be easier to run at home as hardware increments over time. However training is the expensive part, plus they’re probably expecting that to keep scaling with ever higher end models

      • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree with almost all of this, however, much of the RAM during data centre selloffs would be in the SOCAMM format, so not useful for anything consumer nor anything older than a couple years in the enterprise space. If there is such an influx however, I suspect that SOCAMM might become a new format for consumer and enterprise electronics after some time. Other than that, there would also be standard DDR5 DIMMs.

      • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh, Nvidia want’s locally ran ai, but not on your hardware. They want their locked down hardware on your property, using your power and resources.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        It’s much more likely to be like internet fiber. Some was needed/used.

        datacenters will always leverage scale, and AI is only economic at 16+ concurrent users. delivers 3x the tokens/s of a single user. Current rental rates for H200s are below their runcosts. Capacity is already too high in US. Innovations for smaller, faster, cheaper models are providing significant value for less hardware. Gemini flash 3.5 is very small and fast, at much lower cost as top 2 US labs. Deepseek v4 has massive cost reductions that will filter down to rest on industry, especially for context compression which is what allows more users on a single GPU cluster. Qwen 3.6 does bring size down enough to run 3-4 month old state of the art models on consumer hardware, but again multi user service at (pro instead of industrial) 96gb ram.

        MTP and Turboquant are other technologies that increase tps delivery at less ram. Software stacks making better use of GPUs is eating token demand growth by itself even as exaggerated capacity comes online at slower pace than hardware investment values justified.

      • Baggie@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Gonna rate my take on this point by point because you’re speaking my language and I like where your head is at

        AI will by nature become easier to run. We’re pushing Moore’s law already but technology will in general keep improving. I don’t know how worth it it’ll be, and most companies seem to be into the idea of the average consumer not actively owning the computing power, instead of doing everything on the cloud. Time will tell how that goes.

        Big corporations will likely eat each other when the AI bubble pops, whatever that looks like. Should be a fun time though.

        NVIDIA will do the same thing over and over. We saw it with crypto, same with AI. They will surrender to whichever monetary source is biggest at the time, and dumpster the loyal customers. If they change for the better, it’s either by accident or because customers lost faith in the company and went elsewhere. I don’t have high hopes for that company.

        We are seeing china start to make ram, I vaguely remember seeing another graphics card manufacturer? It’s very possible that there’s a market niche that will be filled here.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I vaguely remember seeing another [Chinese] graphics card manufacturer?

          Prob thinking of the Lisuan LX 7G100, which is a bit under 500 bucks USD with performance comparable to 3060’s.

  • bedwyr@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Moving Goods by water is the most economical way to move them, trains are next, trucks are last, I mean after like wagons and shit. We do things the inefficient way because vested interests make money doing it that way. Good luck trying to be more efficient. It’s not going to fucking happen. Not with these fucking clowns in charge. Or the previous clowns that are supposed to be our clowns.

    • Bluewing@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We use trucks because of the “last mile” problem. Ships are the most efficient. But you ain’t pulling up a container ship to your front door. Same with trains. Both are great at moving a lot of stuff from one major point to another. But not good at all for local delivery.

      Nor are they good for fast delivery of smaller amounts. And y’all want your Amazon shit delivered as fast as possible to your door. Or the arugula and potatoes you will buy at your local grocery for supper tonight. I’m not pumping up trucks, but they make that possible.

      Logistics is tiered and integrated every last inch of the way.

      • kossa@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        But you ain’t pulling up a container ship to your front door

        Not with that attitude

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Yeah, the USPS won’t deliver my mail to my home, no rural free delivery for me. It cost me $160 a year to rent a mailbox in town plus the gas to get there and home again. And you expect a container ship to show up out here? UPS and FedEx only deliver here. God willin’ and the creek don’t rise.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Never have I seen so many ships carrying goods in my life than on the ChangJiang, when I lived in Wuhan.
      Absolutely mind-blowing. A line of ships going both ways all the way to the horizon, all day, every day. I can’t even fathom the quantities being carried.

        • bedwyr@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 hours ago

          We have drugs and plants that can be taken as a prophalactic against Malaria.

          In fact, the colonists never could penetrate the tropic and subtropics well until they found out about quinine from the peruvian natives. They took it all the time to ward off the parasite.

          Malaria can be treated with those same drugs an plants as well. Artemisia and Mexican Prickly Poppy both work.

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Yeah, I meant we don’t have a vaccine.

            And those prophylactics have a lot of negative side effect’s. We’re certainly better than before, but Malaria still kills a lot of people today

            • bedwyr@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I know quinine has some side effects, not sure about mexican prickly poppy or artemisia, could look it up.

              There is a malaria vaccine, it just isn’t that effective, I think there are more than one. 30% effective if I recall, and even then it might just have lessened the effects and not prevented the infection. I want to say Sanofi but I don’t recall.

              As to the deaths, it really matters what strain of malaria, there are a lot, and also what they use to treat it. Because using drugs, the parasite gets immune to it, especially when they don’t use them in combination with another antimalarial to prevent resistance forming, which I believe is one reason some parts of Africa have up to half of kids with brain damage from this fucking parasite, (it breaks from liver into bloodstream and colonizes the brain and the body lights us with fever over 106 degrees, which is brain damage.)

              But the plants that treat it, they produce several related drugs around 10% of alkaloids or active ingredient, then a dozen or more at 1% or so, 80% being the main compound. Ie quinine bark the main one is chloroquinine or whatever. Anyway, prevents resistance from forming like with just the isolated chloroquinine, of which malaria is mostly immune to now.

  • My closest city is actually filled with 100+ year old buildings that have old pictures of the building in various points in history. Someone went through a lot of trouble about a decade ago to get everyone on board with displaying historical stuff.

    There’s a road that follows one of the old canals, and a tunnel still technically accessible beneath the main downtown road where deliveries were hauled in order to keep the road up top for PEOPLE to walk on, and carriages were rare until the 1900s.

    Then everything changed in the early-mid 1900s and no hint of canals even exists today in the city, other than one road named “canal” and one named “water”. But without knowing the history, they’re just names.

  • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh, that’s great! Because when the DATA centres grind to a halt, you can send all the contruction workers and civil engineers to finish up your canal projects!

    • Frenchgeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I wonder how the local climate would change with a national canal network… All that water evaporating will change some things.

      • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Usually the canals use a rivers water and run alongside the river, so if a lot of them are at the point of evaporating we’re in much bigger trouble than you presuppose and the Earth will be in it’s death throes.

        But also, i think more evaporation of water leads to more rain and then flooding, so it all balances out ultimately. Just not in a aay that benefits humans at all

      • manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the 1800s canal boats were pulled by horses and people, sailing is pretty impractical for a straight narrow waterway

        • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Honestly it’s kind of insane to hear that america doesn’t have many canals. European countries are full of canals which we absolutely needed in the 1800s-1900s to lug everything around the country. And they’re great, really classy.

          • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The US has so many large natural waterways and so much coastal land that canals were largely unnecessary and only really dug where it would be beneficial to avoid detours and dangerous areas like rapids or shoals. Plus much of the early US economy (in the colonial era, at least) was focused on the export of exotic goods to Europe, so colonies that became major cities like NYC were often built at the mouth of a river where river barges could unload valuable goods like beaver pelts right next to boats getting ready to make their way across the Atlantic.

            The Mississippi River, the second largest river in the US, is over 3,765 km long, stretching almost from Canada all the way to the Gulf of Mexico. Why build a canal when nature has already done the work for you?

            • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Oh yes that’s true isn’t it, i remember hearing it several times before. That is the best case scenario anyway, probably less of a strain on environment or water supplies - and canals here go from one city to the next, which isn’t as feasible on a continental scale.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Canals were really the technology of the 18th century. In 1827 the Baltimore and Ohio was opened as the first passenger and freight railroad and railroads started popping up extrenely rapidly, initially chartered by basically every city to be built along existing roads, then later built with their own right of way.

            West of Appalachia, the land is relatively flat and the existing permanent native American settlements were sparse since their population had collapsed from disease brought by colonists centuries earlier. Railroads engaged in real estate speculation platting out and selling land in cities every 10-20 miles (because the early steam locomotives needed water every 10-20 miles, so might as well have them take on passengers/freight too!) and the federal government was practically paying railroads to take land to better establish the United States’ claim to the land. This rail building boom peaked around the 1860s around which point consolidation started reducing the quantity of rails as railroads consolidated and began building more focused trunks out of their existing right of way.

            In fact, because of how the land grants were written most railroads built a single track in a straight line as fast as possible between their start and end, then once they’d secured the grant for connecting the two points by the extremely aggressive deadline, only then would they start actually rebuilding the track so that it would actually be usable for real rail service.

            So in short, it was a combination of lack of existing (white) cities, land grants by a new government trying to secure its land claims that it believed were it’s manifest destiny, plus innovations in steam engines to make steam locomotives truly viable right at the time when the flegling nation had its feet under it and was ready to start investing heavily into itself.

            TL;DR Right place, right time, right legal environment and right technology

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Also should acknowledge that the Great Lakes and Mississippi River (and major tributaries) made for efficient water shipping to a lot of the major cities of 19th century America. Cincinnati, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, and Milwaukee all have ports.

              And yeah, as you say, there just weren’t major settlements of European Americans anywhere else yet except in the plantation south. California wound up aggressively settled before transcontinental rail, but even there was largely along the coasts. Our national population remains pretty coastal alongside density in the great lakes and major tributaries of the Mississippi.

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Hilariously I forgot about the natural waterways like the Mississippi despite working directly next to the Mississippi and spending my lunches at a park by it for a full year (and that was in a French colonial city from the 17th century)

            • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              it was a combination of lack of existing (white) cities

              Wait - did native Americans have cities of their own, within the territory of modern USA? Or do you just mean settlements in general

              • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                16 hours ago

                Native Americans did in fact have permanent cities, like notably Cahokia in what’s now Illinois. There were also some earlier colonial settlements along major waterways like the Mississippi. It’s likely there were quite a few permanent cities that were lost to time because they weren’t built with materials that would last centuries of abandonment. Notably there are thousands of effigy mounds dotted across the landscape of basically the entire Midwest, which is a very permanent sign of long term habitation or at least locations returned to frequently enough to be worth creating such a monument

  • w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I grew up on the Wabash/Erie canal. It was finished and brought a load of commerce to the region. This is not a post about data centers.

    • Spezi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      The GPUs from these data centers are virtually useless for end users. Even worse than the bitcoin ones, because at least a lot of bitcoin GPUs were consumer cards with a custom BIOS that could be reflashed. The ones in data centers are more dedicated l solutions as the companys building these data centers are much bigger.

      The big question will be if Nvidia and AMD will survive the bubble burst.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’re telling me their canals won’t help my swimming pool at home? But they both use water